Provided by The Guardian |
Facebook will allow users to livestream
attempts to self-harm because it “doesn’t want to censor or punish people in
distress who are attempting suicide”, according to leaked
documents.
However, the footage will be removed
“once there’s no longer an opportunity to help the person” – unless the
incident is particularly newsworthy.
The policy was formulated on the advice
of experts, the files say, and it reflects how the social media company is
trying to deal with some of the most disturbing content on the site.
The Guardian has been told concern within
Facebook about the way people are using the site has increased in the last six
months.
For instance, moderators were recently
told to “escalate” to senior managers any content related to 13
Reasons Why – a Netflix drama about the suicide of a high school student –
because of fears it could inspire copycat behaviour.
Figures circulated to Facebook moderators
appear to show that reports of potential self-harm on the site are rising. One
document drafted last summer says moderators escalated 4,531 reports of
self-harm in two weeks.
Sixty-three of these had to be dealt with
by Facebook’s law enforcement response team – which liaises with police and
other relevant authorities.
Figures for this year show 5,016 reports
in one two-week period and 5,431 in another.
The documents show how Facebook will try
to contact agencies to trigger a “welfare check” when it seems someone is
attempting, or about to attempt, suicide.
A policy update shared with moderators in
recent months explained the shift in thinking.
It says: “We’re now seeing more video
content – including suicides – shared on Facebook. We don’t want to censor or
punish people in distress who are attempting suicide. Experts have told us
what’s best for these people’s safety is to let them live-stream as long as they
are engaging with viewers.
“However, because of the contagion risk
[i.e some people who see suicide are more likely to consider suicide], what’s
best for the safety of people watching these videos is for us to remove them
once there’s no longer an opportunity to help the person. We also need to
consider newsworthiness, and there may be particular moments or public events
that are part of a broader public conversation that warrant leaving up.”
Moderators have been told to “now delete
all videos depicting suicide unless they are newsworthy, even when these videos
are shared by someone other than the victim to raise awareness”.
The documents also tell moderators to
ignore suicide threats when the “intention is only expressed through hashtags
or emoticons” or when the proposed method is unlikely to succeed.
Any threat to kill themselves more than
five days in the future can also be ignored, the files say.
One of the documents says: “Removing
self-harm content from the site may hinder users’ ability to get real-world
help from their real-life communities.
“Users post self-destructive content as a
cry for help, and removing it may prevent that cry for help from getting
through. This is the principle we applied to suicidal posts over a year ago at
the advice of Lifeline and Samaritans, and we now want to extend it to other
content types on the platform.”
Monika Bickert, Facebook’s head of global
policy management, defended leaving some suicide footage on the site. She said:
“We occasionally see particular moments or public events that are part of a
broader public conversation that warrant leaving this content on our platform.
“We work with publishers and other
experts to help us understand what are those moments. For example, on 11
September 2001, bystanders shared videos of the people who jumped from the twin
towers. Had those been livestreamed on Facebook that might have been a moment
in which we would not have removed the content both during and after the
broadcast. We more recently decided to allow a video depicting an Egyptian
man who set himself on fire to protest rising government prices.”
She added: “In instances where someone
posts about self-injury or suicide, we want to be sure that friends and family
members can provide support and help.”
No comments:
Post a Comment